According to an article written for Motoramic by Justin Hyde,
”A physicist from the University of California San Diego used his knowledge of measuring bodies in motion to show in court why he couldn’t be guilty of a ticket for failing to halt at a stop sign. The argument, now a four-page paper delving into the differences between angular and linear motion, supposedly got the physicist out of a $400 ticket.”
Read the article: Motorramic
You can study and download the pdf of his argument here: The Proof of Innocence
”A physicist from the University of California San Diego used his knowledge of measuring bodies in motion to show in court why he couldn’t be guilty of a ticket for failing to halt at a stop sign. The argument, now a four-page paper delving into the differences between angular and linear motion, supposedly got the physicist out of a $400 ticket.”
Read the article: Motorramic
You can study and download the pdf of his argument here: The Proof of Innocence
