OFF THE WIRE
GREG BARNS
FOR the past few months, Tasmania Police has been giving the impression it is running a campaign against bikie gangs.
There
have been regular stories appearing about bikie gangs allegedly buying
properties and bringing weapons and drugs into Tasmania.
The
campaign, if one can call it that, is designed, it seems, to do two
things. Firstly, to ensure that the Tasmanian Parliament introduces
so-called "unexplained wealth" laws and secondly to copy the existing
laws in some other states that outlaw bikie gangs and criminalise
membership and association by individuals with members.
That
Tasmania does not have such laws is a good thing because they trample on
human rights and sweep up innocent people and their families in their
wake.
Unexplained wealth legislation was first introduced in
Western Australia in 2000 with the Northern Territory following soon
after that. The Commonwealth is now looking to introduce similar laws
and Queensland, South Australia and New South Wales have or will soon
have laws.
The essence of these laws is that they place the onus
of proof on the individual whose wealth is in dispute. "In other words,
in jurisdictions with unexplained wealth laws, it is not necessary to
demonstrate on the balance of probabilities that the wealth has been
obtained by criminal activity, but instead, the state places the onus on
an individual to prove that their wealth was acquired by legal means,"
according to the Australian Institute of Criminology's Lorana Bartels in
a paper on the subject published in 2011.
Reversing the onus of
proof is a clear breach of one of the most fundamental of the rights we
all have as citizens in a democracy that is underpinned by the Anglo
system of law.
It is the state that has to prove its case, and the
more important or grave the allegation, the more important it is that
the burden does not shift.
The other difficulty with these laws
is that families suffer demonstrably from their enforcement. Assets of
convicted individuals can be seized by the state under these laws and
those assets include the family home, even if it was not in any way
associated with the crime committed.
There are literally thousands
of innocent husbands, wives, partners and children who have become
homeless because of unexplained wealth laws.
The other part of
the Tasmania Police legislative wishlist is likely to be so-called
anti-bikie laws. Former South Australian Labor Premier Mike Rann, who
despised lawyers and their insistence on fairness, was obsessed with
bikies.
He created laws that have been copied in other states like
Queensland and New South Wales. Parts of these laws have been found to
be unconstitutional by the High Court of Australia but they remain on
the statute books.
Essentially this type of law allows for police
and courts to ban groups or organisations, make it a criminal offence
for people to associate together and make it a criminal offence for a
person who is a member of a banned group to be seen with any members of
that group.
While trying to eliminate bikie gangs was the genesis
of these laws, they can be used by government and their law enforcement
arm to make criminals of any group they like.
Environmental
groups, unions and clubs are all fair game under these laws. Appeal
rights against bans are limited and police can act on secret
intelligence to undermine rights without having to disclose any of this
to the person or group affected.
Tasmanians who care about
democracy and human rights, and who are rightly suspicious of the powers
of the state, should be alarmed at the campaign.
In June last
year, senior Tasmania Police officer Scott Tilyard said that while
existing legislation was "generally adequate", the "implementation of
unexplained wealth legislation, similar to that in other jurisdictions"
would assist police dealing with bikie gangs.
This is simply code for "we would like the Parliament to give us exorbitant amounts of power to do what we need to do".
One
hopes that Mr Tilyard's naked grab for power on behalf of Tasmania
Police is not heeded by our politicians, particularly given the gross
injustices that unexplained wealth laws and anti-association laws are
creating in other parts of Australia. And even more relevantly, in the
absence of proper human rights protections in Tasmania because the
Giddings government has shamefully dropped the idea of a Human Rights
Act to protect citizens from the abuse of power by the state.
We need also to remember that not everybody in a bikie gang is a serious or even minor criminal.
Bikie
gang members have been down at the bushfire sites helping the clean-up.
People join bikie gangs because they enjoy the camaraderie and riding
on the open road. Let's not be seduced by the police media campaign but
see it for what it is -- lobbying for draconian powers.