Wednesday, October 28, 2015
USA - HOORAY – A 53-46 vote
OFF THE WIRE
HOORAY – A 53-46
vote
The U.N.
Resolution 2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps
of most interest is point number 11:
“CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES
TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION and DISARMAMENT of all UN
countries”.
By a 53-46 vote - The
U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution. HOORAY.
This is that brief,
glorious moment in history when everyone stands
around...reloading.
Now, which 46
Senators voted to destroy us? Well, let their names become known !
See below . If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46
“legis..traitors”… vote against them.
In a 53-46
vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United
States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.
The Statement
of Purpose from the Senate Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights
and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms
Trade Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by
the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on
the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all
private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have
implemented an international gun registry, now get this, on
all private guns and ammo.
Astonishingly,
46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our
Constitutional rights to a foreign power.
Here are the
46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.:
Baldwin
(D-WI)
Baucus
(D-MT)
Bennett
(D-CO)
Blumenthal
(D-CT)
Boxer
(D-CA)
Brown
(D-OH)
Cantwell
(D-WA)
Cardin
(D-MD)
Carper
(D-DE)
Casey
(D-PA)
Coons
(D-DE)
Cowan
(D-MA)
Durbin
(D-IL)
Feinstein
(D-CA)
Franken
(D-MN)
Gillibrand
(D-NY)
Harkin
(D-IA)
Hirono
(D-HI)
Johnson
(D-SD)
Kaine
(D-VA)
King
(I-ME)
Klobuchar
(D-MN)
Landrieu
(D-LA)
Leahy
(D-VT)
Levin
(D-MI)
McCaskill
(D-MO)
Menendez
(D-NJ)
Merkley
(D-OR)
Mikulski
(D-MD)
Murphy
(D-CT)
Murray
(D-WA)
Nelson
(D-FL)
Reed
(D-RI)
Reid
(D-NV)
Rockefeller
(D-WV)
Sanders
(I-VT)
Schatz
(D-HI)
Schumer
(D-NY)
Shaheen
(D-NH)
Stabenow
(D-MI)
Udall
(D-CO)
Udall
(D-NM)
Warner
(D-VA)
Warren
(D-MA)
Whitehouse
(D-RI)
Wyden
(D-OR)
Folks, this
needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns. They
need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed.
46 Senators
Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the
U.N.
Did ANY Democrat vote FOR this?????
Please,
Send this
to
SOMEONE
…..
HOORAY – A 53-46
vote
The U.N.
Resolution 2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps
of most interest is point number 11:
“CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES
TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION and DISARMAMENT of all UN
countries”.
By a 53-46 vote - The
U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution. HOORAY.
This is that brief,
glorious moment in history when everyone stands
around...reloading.
Now, which 46
Senators voted to destroy us? Well, let their names become known !
See below . If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46
“legis..traitors”… vote against them.
In a 53-46
vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United
States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.
The Statement
of Purpose from the Senate Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights
and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms
Trade Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by
the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on
the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all
private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have
implemented an international gun registry, now get this, on
all private guns and ammo.
Astonishingly,
46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our
Constitutional rights to a foreign power.
Here are the
46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.:
Baldwin
(D-WI)
Baucus
(D-MT)
Bennett
(D-CO)
Blumenthal
(D-CT)
Boxer
(D-CA)
Brown
(D-OH)
Cantwell
(D-WA)
Cardin
(D-MD)
Carper
(D-DE)
Casey
(D-PA)
Coons
(D-DE)
Cowan
(D-MA)
Durbin
(D-IL)
Feinstein
(D-CA)
Franken
(D-MN)
Gillibrand
(D-NY)
Harkin
(D-IA)
Hirono
(D-HI)
Johnson
(D-SD)
Kaine
(D-VA)
King
(I-ME)
Klobuchar
(D-MN)
Landrieu
(D-LA)
Leahy
(D-VT)
Levin
(D-MI)
McCaskill
(D-MO)
Menendez
(D-NJ)
Merkley
(D-OR)
Mikulski
(D-MD)
Murphy
(D-CT)
Murray
(D-WA)
Nelson
(D-FL)
Reed
(D-RI)
Reid
(D-NV)
Rockefeller
(D-WV)
Sanders
(I-VT)
Schatz
(D-HI)
Schumer
(D-NY)
Shaheen
(D-NH)
Stabenow
(D-MI)
Udall
(D-CO)
Udall
(D-NM)
Warner
(D-VA)
Warren
(D-MA)
Whitehouse
(D-RI)
Wyden
(D-OR)
Folks, this
needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns. They
need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed.
46 Senators
Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the
U.N.
Did ANY Democrat vote FOR this?????
Please,
Send this
to
SOMEONE
…..
CHICAGO IL - “Because You’re Filming Me, I am Taking His Car” Video Epitomizes Distrust of Cops
OFF THE WIRE
By Andrew Emett
By Andrew Emett
Chicago, IL — After recording a video
of plainclothes officers harassing him for ordering a Lyft ride at the
airport, a YouTube user was ordered out of the car and had his cellphone
confiscated in a failed attempt to delete the video. Although the Lyft
driver pleaded with the cops not to impound his vehicle because he could
not afford the fees, the officer sadistically punished the driver after
blaming the passenger for recording him.
According to a YouTube user who wishes to remain anonymous, he flew into Chicago O’Hare on the evening of September 2 after a long business trip and ordered a Lyft. As he waited for his ride, two plainclothes cops confronted him for standing on the side of the road. Assuming they were airport security, he lied to them and told the cops that his girlfriend was picking him up soon.
After he reportedly asked them if it was illegal to stand on the side of the road, they lied and told him it was illegal. When his Lyft driver arrived, he placed his luggage in the car and bid the officers a good night. Instead of letting a tired man go home, the officers followed their car before pulling them over and accusing the passenger of lying to them.
“The male officer (Michael Orlando Badge #5594), approached the driver side window as the female officer stayed out of sight (Jamie Gillardo badge # 9431),” the passenger wrote. “Orlando began yelling at me and accusing me of lying to him. I attempted to explain that I was simply not in the mood for unwarranted questions and he continued to yell at the driver and I. At this point I began to fear for my well being and began to video tape the officer. He immediately stopped yelling but continued using scare tactics.”
In the video, the Lyft driver pleads with Orlando, “Sir, please, I’m 21-years-old. I’m going to DePaul. I’m paying for school with this car. If I get a $2,400 ticket, I can’t even afford to—”
Interrupting with callous disregard for the young man’s worries, Orlando interjects pointing at the passenger, “He’s gonna pay it.”
After Orlando briefly confers with Gillardo, he attempts to intimidate the passenger by telling him, “And sir, you can record me all you want.”
“Nah, just for everyone’s safety,” the passenger responds.
“Yeah, you know what?” Orlando asks rhetorically. “Just because you’re recording me, now I have to issue the (inexplicable) and impound the vehicle.”
Although Lyft drivers are allowed to drop off passengers at O’Hare, they are restricted from picking up customers. Despite the fact that thousands of people have signed petitions to lift the ban, Mayor Rahm Emanuel continues to ignore them.
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/dear-cops-bunch-americans-hate/#5jlBHIoytpH2bHX7.99
According to a YouTube user who wishes to remain anonymous, he flew into Chicago O’Hare on the evening of September 2 after a long business trip and ordered a Lyft. As he waited for his ride, two plainclothes cops confronted him for standing on the side of the road. Assuming they were airport security, he lied to them and told the cops that his girlfriend was picking him up soon.
After he reportedly asked them if it was illegal to stand on the side of the road, they lied and told him it was illegal. When his Lyft driver arrived, he placed his luggage in the car and bid the officers a good night. Instead of letting a tired man go home, the officers followed their car before pulling them over and accusing the passenger of lying to them.
“The male officer (Michael Orlando Badge #5594), approached the driver side window as the female officer stayed out of sight (Jamie Gillardo badge # 9431),” the passenger wrote. “Orlando began yelling at me and accusing me of lying to him. I attempted to explain that I was simply not in the mood for unwarranted questions and he continued to yell at the driver and I. At this point I began to fear for my well being and began to video tape the officer. He immediately stopped yelling but continued using scare tactics.”
In the video, the Lyft driver pleads with Orlando, “Sir, please, I’m 21-years-old. I’m going to DePaul. I’m paying for school with this car. If I get a $2,400 ticket, I can’t even afford to—”
Interrupting with callous disregard for the young man’s worries, Orlando interjects pointing at the passenger, “He’s gonna pay it.”
After Orlando briefly confers with Gillardo, he attempts to intimidate the passenger by telling him, “And sir, you can record me all you want.”
“Nah, just for everyone’s safety,” the passenger responds.
“Yeah, you know what?” Orlando asks rhetorically. “Just because you’re recording me, now I have to issue the (inexplicable) and impound the vehicle.”
Although Lyft drivers are allowed to drop off passengers at O’Hare, they are restricted from picking up customers. Despite the fact that thousands of people have signed petitions to lift the ban, Mayor Rahm Emanuel continues to ignore them.
After Orlando ordered them out of the car, Gillardo can be heard telling the passenger, “Make sure you get my good side.”
As a uniformed officer approached him, the passenger slid his phone into his pocket while it continued recording. During a brief pat down, the cop found his cellphone and turned off the video after accidentally recording his own face for an instant. While the uniformed cop attempted to delete the video, the passenger asked him if deleting evidence was legal.
“You better f**king believe this is legal,” the cop reportedly yelled at him. “You may be big sh*t where you are from but you are in my territory and I AM KING!”
Taking turns screaming at him, the uniformed cop and Orlando weren’t bright enough to realize that the phone had locked and required a code to access the video. Out of desperation, Orlando allegedly offered to release them if the passenger deleted the footage. But he was smart enough to realize that Orlando was probably lying and would arrest them anyway after deleting the video.
After he refused to delete the evidence, the officers released him but would not allow him to retrieve his luggage from the car. Ordered into the back of a patrol car, he was treated like a criminal even though he had committed no crime. Before picking up his belongings, the passenger spoke with Orlando’s supervisor at the police station and accused the plainclothes cop of attempted blackmail. Orlando denied the allegations.
In 2009, Orlando shot a fleeing suspect in the chest and accused him of trying to run over the officer with his vehicle. Andrzej Wojtkielewicz was charged with aggravated battery and attempted murder, but the jury acquitted him of attempted murder after it was revealed that his vehicle was in park and his hands were up before Orlando shot him.
With cops like these, who needs enemies?
As a uniformed officer approached him, the passenger slid his phone into his pocket while it continued recording. During a brief pat down, the cop found his cellphone and turned off the video after accidentally recording his own face for an instant. While the uniformed cop attempted to delete the video, the passenger asked him if deleting evidence was legal.
“You better f**king believe this is legal,” the cop reportedly yelled at him. “You may be big sh*t where you are from but you are in my territory and I AM KING!”
Taking turns screaming at him, the uniformed cop and Orlando weren’t bright enough to realize that the phone had locked and required a code to access the video. Out of desperation, Orlando allegedly offered to release them if the passenger deleted the footage. But he was smart enough to realize that Orlando was probably lying and would arrest them anyway after deleting the video.
After he refused to delete the evidence, the officers released him but would not allow him to retrieve his luggage from the car. Ordered into the back of a patrol car, he was treated like a criminal even though he had committed no crime. Before picking up his belongings, the passenger spoke with Orlando’s supervisor at the police station and accused the plainclothes cop of attempted blackmail. Orlando denied the allegations.
In 2009, Orlando shot a fleeing suspect in the chest and accused him of trying to run over the officer with his vehicle. Andrzej Wojtkielewicz was charged with aggravated battery and attempted murder, but the jury acquitted him of attempted murder after it was revealed that his vehicle was in park and his hands were up before Orlando shot him.
With cops like these, who needs enemies?
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/dear-cops-bunch-americans-hate/#5jlBHIoytpH2bHX7.99
USA - FBI Director Again Blames Citizens With Smart Phones For Increase in Crime
OFF THE WIRE
Yes, self awareness causes crime. It couldn't be that all of this corruption and criminal activity was going on before cell phones. Cell phones caused cops to commit crime. It is your fault. Put your damn phones away so we can all be happy in bliss and ignorance. I am starting to believe that this is the start of a massive awakening, where free people have become aware that they are actually slaves to a highly corrupt government. No wonder Matrix is still one of my favorite movies. If it doesn't get filmed then it must have not happened.
MAC
Twice in recent days, FBI Director James B. Comey has stepped to a podium here and asserted that police across the nation are reluctant to aggressively enforce the law in the post-Ferguson era of smartphones and YouTube.
And twice his comments have drawn disagreement and derision from a host of sources, including civil rights activists, law enforcement officials and, on Monday, the White House.
“The available evidence at this point does not support the notion that law enforcement officers around the country are shying away from fulfilling their responsibilities,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday at a news briefing in Washington. “The evidence that we’ve seen so far doesn’t support the contention that law enforcement officials are somehow shirking their responsibility.”
Comey, nonetheless, stayed the course, telling thousands of police officials gathered here for a conference of the International Association of Chiefs of Police that a violent crime wave is gripping the nation’s major cities. And he suggested that police officers themselves are in part to blame, made gun shy by the prospect of getting caught on the next video of alleged police brutality.
The “age of viral videos” has fundamentally altered U.S. policing, Comey said Monday in a speech virtually identical to one he delivered last week at the University of Chicago Law School.
His comments have been interpreted as giving credence to the notion of a “Ferguson effect” — the theory that riots and racial unrest in places such as Ferguson, Mo., and Baltimore, where police killed civilians, has prompted police officers to become more restrained. That, in turn, has theoretically resulted in an uptick in violent crime as criminals become emboldened.
Comey acknowledged Monday that he has little evidence to support the theory.
“The question is, are these kinds of things changing police behavior around the country? The honest answer is: I don’t know for sure whether that’s the case,” he said, but he added that “I do have a strong sense” it’s true.
It’s “the one theory that to my mind and to my common sense does explain” rising rates of urban violence in 2015.
Coming from the nation’s top law enforcement official, the remarks have landed like a bombshell in criminal-justice circles, offending people across the political spectrum. Civil rights groups and activists have taken deep exception to the idea that crime rates might be linked to protests against police brutality.
Amnesty International USA Executive Director Steven Hawkins called Comey’s comments “outrageous” and “unsubstantiated.”
Policing groups, meanwhile, have been equally infuriated by the assertion that their officers have been somehow derelict in their duties, frightened by teenagers with cellphone cameras.
“Time and time again [Comey] generalizes about a segment of the population that he knows nothing about,” said James O. Pasco Jr., executive director of the National Fraternal Order of Police. “He has never been a police officer.”
Comey is “like the scarecrow in ‘The Wizard of Oz,’ ” Pasco said. “He wanders around pretending to be smart and then at the end they give him a diploma and he thinks he’s a genius. They swear him in as the director of the FBI and all of a sudden he’s an expert on what police officers are thinking.”The speeches also have put Comey at odds with the White House, as President Obama is eager to take credit for lowering the crime rate.
As Comey was preparing to deliver his address Friday, Obama was hosting a criminal-justice forum at the White House, where he celebrated “incredible, historic reductions in crime over the last 20 years.”
“I know that there’s been some talk in the press about spikes that are happening this year relative to last year. I’ve asked my team to look very carefully at it — Attorney General [Loretta E.] Lynch has pulled together a task force — and it does look like there are a handful of cities where we’re seeing higher-than-normal spikes,” Obama said at the time. However, he added, “across the 93 or 95 top cities, it’s very hard to distinguish anything statistically meaningful.”
In his speech Monday, Comey also urged law enforcement leaders to stop engaging in an us-vs.- them tug of war with protesters from Black Lives Matter, the group that sprung up in the wake of the August 2014 shooting of a black teenager by a white police officer in Ferguson.
Instead, Comey said, police chiefs should use the budding protest movement as a window into the minds of those they are charged with protecting.
“There is a line of law enforcement and a line of communities we serve, especially communities of color,” Comey said. “Each time somebody interprets ‘hashtag Black Lives Matter’ as anti-law-enforcement, one line moves away. And each time someone interprets ‘hashtag Police Lives Matter’ as anti-black, the other line moves away.”
Comey’s comments come weeks after he held a session with 100 city leaders and law enforcement officials from across the nation. At that meeting, many — including Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel (D) — reported that police morale was sinking in their towns amid ongoing scrutiny.
“We have allowed our police department to get fetal, and it is having a direct consequence,” Emanuel said during the meeting. “They have pulled back from the ability to interdict. . . . They don’t want to be a news story themselves. They don’t want their career ended early. And it’s having an impact.”
Comey said such feedback has served as inspiration for his recent speeches, in which he declared that violent-crime rates are being inflated by “a chill wind blowing through American law enforcement over the last year.”
“That wind is surely changing behavior,” Comey said, later adding: “We need to figure out what’s happening and deal with it now. I refuse to wait. . . . These aren’t data points — these are lives.”
In his speech, Comey also contradicted what has been the administration’s stance on the incarceration of thousands of men and women in the 1980s and 1990s related to the national drug war.
“Each drug dealer, each mugger, each killer and each felon with a gun had his own lawyer, his own case, his own time before judge and jury, his own sentencing, and, in many cases, an appeal or other post-sentencing review,” Comey said. “There were thousands and thousands of those individual cases, but to speak of ‘mass incarceration,’ I believe, is confusing, and it distorts an important reality.”
The Obama administration has worked to undo many of the policies that are credited with spurring a period of “mass incarceration,” and has boasted that 2014 was the first year in modern history that both the crime rate and number of federal prisoners declined.
“I can’t speak to the range of Director Comey’s views on this topic,” Earnest said when asked about Comey’s remarks on mass incarceration. “The president certainly does believe that there are certain elements of the criminal-justice system that are not serving the country in communities all across the country very well.”
Yes, self awareness causes crime. It couldn't be that all of this corruption and criminal activity was going on before cell phones. Cell phones caused cops to commit crime. It is your fault. Put your damn phones away so we can all be happy in bliss and ignorance. I am starting to believe that this is the start of a massive awakening, where free people have become aware that they are actually slaves to a highly corrupt government. No wonder Matrix is still one of my favorite movies. If it doesn't get filmed then it must have not happened.
MAC
Twice in recent days, FBI Director James B. Comey has stepped to a podium here and asserted that police across the nation are reluctant to aggressively enforce the law in the post-Ferguson era of smartphones and YouTube.
And twice his comments have drawn disagreement and derision from a host of sources, including civil rights activists, law enforcement officials and, on Monday, the White House.
“The available evidence at this point does not support the notion that law enforcement officers around the country are shying away from fulfilling their responsibilities,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday at a news briefing in Washington. “The evidence that we’ve seen so far doesn’t support the contention that law enforcement officials are somehow shirking their responsibility.”
Comey, nonetheless, stayed the course, telling thousands of police officials gathered here for a conference of the International Association of Chiefs of Police that a violent crime wave is gripping the nation’s major cities. And he suggested that police officers themselves are in part to blame, made gun shy by the prospect of getting caught on the next video of alleged police brutality.
The “age of viral videos” has fundamentally altered U.S. policing, Comey said Monday in a speech virtually identical to one he delivered last week at the University of Chicago Law School.
His comments have been interpreted as giving credence to the notion of a “Ferguson effect” — the theory that riots and racial unrest in places such as Ferguson, Mo., and Baltimore, where police killed civilians, has prompted police officers to become more restrained. That, in turn, has theoretically resulted in an uptick in violent crime as criminals become emboldened.
Comey acknowledged Monday that he has little evidence to support the theory.
“The question is, are these kinds of things changing police behavior around the country? The honest answer is: I don’t know for sure whether that’s the case,” he said, but he added that “I do have a strong sense” it’s true.
It’s “the one theory that to my mind and to my common sense does explain” rising rates of urban violence in 2015.
Coming from the nation’s top law enforcement official, the remarks have landed like a bombshell in criminal-justice circles, offending people across the political spectrum. Civil rights groups and activists have taken deep exception to the idea that crime rates might be linked to protests against police brutality.
Amnesty International USA Executive Director Steven Hawkins called Comey’s comments “outrageous” and “unsubstantiated.”
Policing groups, meanwhile, have been equally infuriated by the assertion that their officers have been somehow derelict in their duties, frightened by teenagers with cellphone cameras.
“Time and time again [Comey] generalizes about a segment of the population that he knows nothing about,” said James O. Pasco Jr., executive director of the National Fraternal Order of Police. “He has never been a police officer.”
Comey is “like the scarecrow in ‘The Wizard of Oz,’ ” Pasco said. “He wanders around pretending to be smart and then at the end they give him a diploma and he thinks he’s a genius. They swear him in as the director of the FBI and all of a sudden he’s an expert on what police officers are thinking.”The speeches also have put Comey at odds with the White House, as President Obama is eager to take credit for lowering the crime rate.
As Comey was preparing to deliver his address Friday, Obama was hosting a criminal-justice forum at the White House, where he celebrated “incredible, historic reductions in crime over the last 20 years.”
“I know that there’s been some talk in the press about spikes that are happening this year relative to last year. I’ve asked my team to look very carefully at it — Attorney General [Loretta E.] Lynch has pulled together a task force — and it does look like there are a handful of cities where we’re seeing higher-than-normal spikes,” Obama said at the time. However, he added, “across the 93 or 95 top cities, it’s very hard to distinguish anything statistically meaningful.”
In his speech Monday, Comey also urged law enforcement leaders to stop engaging in an us-vs.- them tug of war with protesters from Black Lives Matter, the group that sprung up in the wake of the August 2014 shooting of a black teenager by a white police officer in Ferguson.
Instead, Comey said, police chiefs should use the budding protest movement as a window into the minds of those they are charged with protecting.
“There is a line of law enforcement and a line of communities we serve, especially communities of color,” Comey said. “Each time somebody interprets ‘hashtag Black Lives Matter’ as anti-law-enforcement, one line moves away. And each time someone interprets ‘hashtag Police Lives Matter’ as anti-black, the other line moves away.”
Comey’s comments come weeks after he held a session with 100 city leaders and law enforcement officials from across the nation. At that meeting, many — including Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel (D) — reported that police morale was sinking in their towns amid ongoing scrutiny.
“We have allowed our police department to get fetal, and it is having a direct consequence,” Emanuel said during the meeting. “They have pulled back from the ability to interdict. . . . They don’t want to be a news story themselves. They don’t want their career ended early. And it’s having an impact.”
Comey said such feedback has served as inspiration for his recent speeches, in which he declared that violent-crime rates are being inflated by “a chill wind blowing through American law enforcement over the last year.”
“That wind is surely changing behavior,” Comey said, later adding: “We need to figure out what’s happening and deal with it now. I refuse to wait. . . . These aren’t data points — these are lives.”
In his speech, Comey also contradicted what has been the administration’s stance on the incarceration of thousands of men and women in the 1980s and 1990s related to the national drug war.
“Each drug dealer, each mugger, each killer and each felon with a gun had his own lawyer, his own case, his own time before judge and jury, his own sentencing, and, in many cases, an appeal or other post-sentencing review,” Comey said. “There were thousands and thousands of those individual cases, but to speak of ‘mass incarceration,’ I believe, is confusing, and it distorts an important reality.”
The Obama administration has worked to undo many of the policies that are credited with spurring a period of “mass incarceration,” and has boasted that 2014 was the first year in modern history that both the crime rate and number of federal prisoners declined.
“I can’t speak to the range of Director Comey’s views on this topic,” Earnest said when asked about Comey’s remarks on mass incarceration. “The president certainly does believe that there are certain elements of the criminal-justice system that are not serving the country in communities all across the country very well.”
UNDER MARSHAL LAW ALL THESE EXEC ORDERS WILL BE INVOKED.
OFF THE WIRE
UNDER MARSHAL LAW ALL THESE EXEC ORDERS WILL BE INVOKED. Executive Orders from Hell! Why would an American President ever do this? EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000
allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990
allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 1099
allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997
allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998
allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10999
allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000
allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001
allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002
designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003
allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004
allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005
allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051
specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310
grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049
assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10206627103420551
UNDER MARSHAL LAW ALL THESE EXEC ORDERS WILL BE INVOKED. Executive Orders from Hell! Why would an American President ever do this? EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000
allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990
allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 1099
allows the government to seize and control the communication media.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997
allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998
allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 10999
allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000
allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001
allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002
designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003
allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004
allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005
allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051
specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310
grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049
assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10206627103420551
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
