OFF THE WIRE
December 5, 2018
SANTA ANA, Calif. (CN) — A defense attorney for the Mongol Nation
motorcycle club told a California jury Tuesday that federal prosecutors
had not presented any evidence that the club ever violated racketeering
laws or engaged in a conspiracy — indeed, he said, it could not be
convicted of conspiracy because an entity cannot conspire with itself.
“There’s no evidence that the Mongol Nation conspired to do
anything,” Joseph A. Yanny told the Orange County jury in his closing
arguments.
“There are individual members” who have committed crimes, he
acknowledged, but “there’s no evidence at all that the club joined in
those activities.”
He said the club itself cannot be held liable for “isolated incidents committed by boneheads.”
Yanny described the prosecution of his client — which began with
undercover investigations going back 20 years — as persecution of the
largely Latino club by corrupt agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives. He implored the jury to “send a message that
this type of prosecution against these men has got to stop.”
Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher M. Brunwin countered that the
Mongol Nation as a body encourages and rewards crime. “They are a
violent organization that attacks people, that kills people and that
distributes drugs,” he said during rebuttal.
“This is what they do,” Brunwin said as he displayed a photo of a man
beaten to death by Mongols. “This is what they brag about. This is what
they’re proud of.”
He said the Mongol Nation even rewards members who kill people on its
behalf with special patches to sew onto their biker vests, including
one he called a “murder patch.” It shows a skull-and-crossbones with a
capital “M” on the skull’s forehead.
He scoffed at Yanny’s explanation that the M merely stands for Mongols.
Brunwin and co-counsel Assistant U.S. Attorney Steven R. Welk charged
the Mongol Nation, as an “unincorporated association,” with violating
the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and conspiracy to
commit racketeering.
They have not charged any individuals with crimes. As Yanny told the jury at the beginning of the trial, “No one is going to jail out of this trial.”
In a 2008 case, however, 79 Mongols and associates pleaded guilty to racketeering and other crimes.
A major goal of the current case is to seize, through criminal
forfeiture, the gang’s trademark to its distinctive main patch, which
full members wear on the back of their vests. The design shows the word
“Mongols” in an arc above what has been described as “a cartoonish
depiction of a Genghis Khan-like character” riding a motorcycle and
waving a sword.
If the prosecutors succeed, “no member of the gang would be allowed
to wear the trademark that we believe is synonymous with the group,” a
representative of the U.S. Attorney’s Office has said.
Prosecutors are also seeking a fine and forfeiture of the club’s assets.
A significant but technical legal issue facing the jury is whether
the Mongol Nation as an entity can be guilty of racketeering and
conspiracy to engage in racketeering with itself.
Under the federal RICO Act, a “person,” including a corporation or
association, can be charged with a crime only for engaging racketeering
activities with an “enterprise.”
Brunwin and Welk say that criminal enterprise is the larger Mongol
biker gang, of which the formal Mongol Nation is only a piece.
At one point in the case, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter ruled
that “there is no meaningful distinction” between the two, but he was
reversed in July 2017 by the Ninth Circuit.
On Monday morning, Carter instructed the jury that prosecutors must
prove the Mongol Nation and the Mongol gang are distinct entities. The
Mongol Nation cannot be guilty of racketeering, the judge said, if there
is only one entity.
Therefore, Yanny later told the jury, “If you find that there is no
distinction, we can all go home. You just find the defendant not
guilty.”
After all, he argued, “Where did you hear testimony that the Mongol
Nation is separate from the Mongol gang? I don’t remember any testimony
like that during the government’s case.”
In his closing argument Monday, Welk argued
that only Mongols who have risen through the ranks to earn the right to
wear the complete insignia patch on their vests are members of the
Mongol Nation. Citing the group’s detailed, written constitution, he
said that other associates, prospects and “hang-arounds” are only part
of the gang but not “full-patch” Mongols.
Yanny scoffed at the distinction. “They’re all members; they’re just
members with different degrees of rights and responsibilities,” he said.
“They all pay dues,” and they all owe loyalty to the club.
Although they can’t vote on club business, men in the process of
earning a patch do attend the group’s meetings to assist the full-patch
members by guarding the motorcycles and running errands.
Brunwin countered that the Mongol Nation is a legal person because it
can, and does, own property, specifically its trademarks in the patch
design. Other members of the broader gang have no property interests in
the trademarks, he said.
The prosecutor spent most of his rebuttal, however, recalling
evidence of several violent crimes attributed to Mongols, including the
murder of a Hells Angels leader in San Francisco, beatings and knifings
of enemies or men they believed had insulted them, and a deadly brawl
between a large number of Mongols and Hells Angels in Laughlin, Nev., in
2002.
“Is this an organization that conspires to commit murder?” Brunwin
asked. “You bet it is, and you heard it over and over” from witnesses
and from Mongols themselves in audio and video recordings played during
the five-week trial.
He ended by recounting again for the jury the death of local police
officer Shaun Diamond, allegedly killed when Mongol David Martinez fired
a shotgun as police broke down Martinez’s door at 4 a.m. in October
2014 to serve a search warrant. A slug from the shotgun entered the back
of Diamond’s head and came out through his mouth as his partner
watched, Brunwin said.
The jury began deliberating early Tuesday afternoon.
