OFF THE WIRE
By Gabrielle Abbott
Motorcyclists who roll down Arizona highways agree that riding in the open air is one of life’s exhilarations. The disagreements become sharp when the subject of whether to wear a helmet – or whether the state should mandate helmet use – is on the table.
In an attempt to appease both groups, Rep. Randall Friese, D-Tucson, has introduced House Bill 2052, that would require all motorcycle riders to wear a helmet, unless they pay a fee when registering the motorcycle. The fee would be determined by the Arizona Department of Transportation. Current Arizona law only requires motorcycle riders under 18 to wear a helmet.
Under this legislation, an officer could not pull over a rider if they weren’t wearing a helmet; it would be a secondary offense. A rider who is cited would be fined $500, with $200 going to the Highway User Revenue Fund and $300 going to the Spinal and Head Injuries Trust Fund.
Friese, a trauma surgeon who frequently takes care of head-injured patients, said the bill is a step in the right direction for improving public safety and reducing costs.
“Certainly any program that promotes safety on the road I would be supporting,” Friese said. “But I believe firmly that if we can persuade, or if we can increase the amount of riders wearing helmets, we would recognize, realize some decrease in healthcare costs.”
The legislation is a middle ground between achieving the freedoms riders want, and reducing the risks of head injury, Friese said.
Cronkite News wants to know …
Should motorcycle riders in Arizona be required to wear helmets?
Yes
No
Only if they choose not to pay Friese's proposed addtional fee
Motorcycle helmets reduce the risk of head injury by 69 percent and reduce the risk of death by 42 percent, according to a report by the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, a pro-helmet safety organization.
“I believe, and I listen to the motorcycle riders saying ‘we want to
choose,’ ” Friese said. “I don’t believe it is a right to not wear your
helmet. I believe it is a privilege, just as driving is a privilege.”
Cathy Chase, vice president of governmental affairs for the Advocates
group, said that a compromise is a disappointment and a weakening of an
already weak law.
In 2014, states lacking an all-rider helmet law saw 10 times more
unhelmeted fatalities than states with an all-rider helmet law,
according to information from the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration in the Advocates report.
“All of our positions are based on research, and research has clearly
demonstrated that all-rider motorcycle helmet laws are the most
effective way to get motorcyclists to wear their helmets,” Chase said.
“So our position, which is based on safety and research, is that all
riders should be required to wear helmets.”
Head injuries are debilitating and sometimes have the effect of
limiting the ability of members of society to function, Chase said,
which then leads to a “ripple effect” of changing more than one life.
“Some of the motorcyclists who don’t want to be required to wear a
helmet argue that they should be given a choice,” Chase said. “Their
mantra is kind of, ‘let those who ride decide.’ The problem with that is
that all taxpayers wind up footing the bill, so our response is, let
those who pay have a say.”
The economic cost of motorcycle crashes in 2010 totaled $12.9
billion, and helmets save $2.7 billion in costs, according to
information provided by the NHTSA in the Advocates report.
John Dreyfus, the designated lobbyist for the Arizona Confederation
of Motorcycle Clubs, said helmets do not protect riders; helmets
interfere with the ability to be alert and that is why he chooses not to
wear one.
“When I’m riding I feel like I’m part of the outside world,” Dreyfus
said. “I can feel the air, I can hear the sounds around me.”
Helmets also have blind spots that can lead to life-threatening mistakes, Dreyfus said.
In contrast, Mick Degn, the motorcycle task manager for the Arizona
Strategic Highway Safety Plan, chooses to wear a helmet, and believes it
is a minor part of larger efforts to being safe.
“The issue is, there needs to be more on safety gear when you’re
riding a motorcycle because you’re in the open, you’re riding down a
concrete blacktop road and you should have the proper gear,” said Degn,
who is also the chairman of the Arizona Motorcycle Safety and Awareness
Foundation. “The proper gear, to me, is a helmet, long-sleeved shirt,
long pants, good boots, and gloves.”
Although Degn and Dreyfus differ in the personal choice of wearing a
helmet, they both agree that wearing a helmet should not be a
requirement for all and that House Bill 2052, is leaving out a major
initiative in motorcycle safety promotion.
Dreyfus said that helmets are a “placebo” and that prevention is the most important aspect of motorcycle safety.
“What our position is, is that the best way to survive a motorcycle crash is to not get in it in the first place,” Dreyfus said.
Some of the most effective forms of prevention are taught in
motorcycle training courses, Degn said. “You have to look at the whole
package of motorcycle safety and awareness.”
During these classes riders learn the dangers of drinking and
driving, how to react when facing obstacles, how to turn properly and
how to choose the best safety gear, for example.
Degn said safety in the motorcycle community should be encouraged
more. He said helmets should not be mandatory, but the effects of
helmets should be learned through first-hand experience in a training
course.
“A choice is the right way to go,” he said. “ We shouldn’t demand or create a bill that says we have to wear a helmet.”
According to the Advocates report, 19 states and Washington D.C. have
all-rider helmet laws, 28 states have age-specific helmet laws and
three states do not have any helmet laws.
The motorcycle riders who feel strongly about the ability to choose
are the reason this bill will most likely not go very far, Friese said.
“There’s a minority of people who don’t want this to move forward and they’re very vocal,” Friese said.
But, Chase said safety is unlikely to be achieved until the most
strict helmet laws, all-rider motorcycle helmet laws, are put into
effect.
The current Arizona highway and auto safety status was given a
“danger” rating in the Advocates report, suggesting Arizona strengthen
its laws.
