Thursday, November 5, 2015

What Loretta Lynch Just Announced at the UN is Literally the End of America – See Why Here


SOTU

OFF THE WIRE
Attorney General Loretta Lynch recently made an announcement at the UN that the Obama administration will be inviting a “global police force” into several American cities in order to fight “violent extremism.”
The program called the Strong Cities Network (SCN) constitutes a law enforcement initiative that is set to be implemented across the globe that claims to want to “strengthen community resilience against violent extremism.”
As Obama stated in a recent speech he delivered at the UN, “violent extremism” is not something that is exclusive to Islam, so who exactly does the president want to use this global police force against?
According to Breitbart:
The United Nations is a sharia-compliant world body, and Obama, speaking there just days ago, insisted that “violent extremism” is not exclusive to Islam (which it is). Obama is redefining jihad terror to include everyone but the jihadists. So will the UN, driven largely by the sharia-enforcing Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the pro-Islamic post-American President Obama, use a “global police force” to crush counter-jihad forces?
After all, with Obama knowingly aiding al-Qaeda forces in Syria, how likely is it that he will use his “global police force” against actual Islamic jihadists? I suspect that instead, this global police force will be used to impose the blasphemy laws under the sharia (Islamic law), and to silence all criticism of Islam for the President who proclaimed that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
What is a global police force doing in our cities? This is exactly the abdication of American sovereignty that I warned about in my book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America. The Obama Department of Justice made it clear that it was exactly that when it distributed a press release last week announcing the “Launch of Strong Cities Network to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism.” In that press release, the DoJ complained that “while many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.”
So if the local and municipal effort to counter the euphemistic and disingenuous “violent extremism” is inadequate and hasn’t developed “systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale,” the feds – and the UN – have to step in. Thus the groundwork is being laid for federal and international interference down to the local level. “The Strong Cities Network,” Lynch declared, “will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration” – i.e., local dependence on federal and international authorities.
Lynch made the global (that is, United Nations) involvement clear when she added: “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”
Allowing a global police force that is not subject to American laws or the Constitution to operate within the United States — without the consent of Congress — is something completely foreign and unacceptable to the American consciousness. Although AG Lynch claims the SCN would be used to “enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience,” Americans should be on alert.
Since when has the Obama administration done anything to strengthen America? He refuses to call terrorism by its name and refuses to accept that those carrying out terrorism throughout the world almost exclusively belong to one particular group.
What do you think? Should we take the Obama administration at its word?