Great NEWS! Cops Can’t Violate 4th Amendment by Prolonging Traffic Stops to Wait for Drug Dogs

OFF THE WIRE
Great NEWS! Cops Can’t Violate 4th Amendment by Prolonging Traffic Stops to Wait for Drug Dogs: http://bit.ly/1DdCK2H

Links People Also Shared

• Supreme Court: Cops can’t hold suspects to wait for drug-sniffing dog It's against the law to hold a suspect for even a few extra minutes, the Supreme Court ruled. Save
• Supreme Court Says Police Violated 4th Amendment When Use of Drug-Sniffing Dog Prolonged Routine Traffic Stop Law enforcement loses 6-3 in Rodriguez v. United States. Save
• Illinois v. Caballes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment is not violated when the use of a drug-sniffing dog during a routine traffic stop does not unreasonably prolong the length of the stop. Save en.wikipedia.org ·