Thursday, April 29, 2010

Motorcyclists challenge seizure of alleged illegal helmets

Off the Wire
Biker Rights Issues

Motorcyclists are ticked off with the enforcement actions of the Adrian police — and they are taking their fight to court.

The Adrian Daily Telegram reports that the issue came to the forefront last week when at least eight riders were pulled over, ticketed and their helmets confiscated by Adrian Police Sgt. Lynn Courington. The tickets and confiscation were because the helmets allegedly do not meet U.S. Department of Transportation standards. Adrian Police Chief Terry Collins has since decided to return the helmets.

Here’s how the Telegram reported Courington’s actions last week:

Adrian police shift commander Sgt. Lynn Courington is on the lookout for helmets that don’t meet federal Department of Transportation standards. And riders using helmets without the required padding are easy to spot, he said.

“If they get stopped, they’re going to get a ticket,” said Courington.

Tuesday, motorcycle supporters flooded the Lenawee County Court house to support one man, out of what the Telegram reports were more than a dozen hit with the tickets. Ryan Hildebrand, 26, is fighting the charge and is being represented by a lawyer from the national motorcycle rights groups’ local affiliate, ABATE of Michigan.

The Telegram reports the challenge is based on a federal court case ABATE is currently litigating in the Federal District Court Western District in Grand Rapids.

ABATE currently has a lawsuit pending in United State District Court in Grand Rapids, challenging the state’s DOT helmet rule.

Parts of the lawsuit were dismissed in an opinion issued April 16 by Judge Robert Holmes Bell. But the court rejected a state police motion to dismiss part of the complaint that deals with the enforcement issues Katkowsky said he plans to raise in Lenawee County District Court.

Bell’s opinion stated Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rulings require probable cause to justify a traffic stop on a civil infraction. ABATE claims in the lawsuit that police have to look inside a helmet to determine if it meets DOT standards, and therefore cannot claim plain sight evidence to justify a traffic stop and request to inspect a helmet.

A hearing on the case has been scheduled for June 29.

original article